ФОРУМ «НЕВРОЛОГИЯ БУДУЩЕГО», 12 НОЯБРЯ, САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ
Национальная ассоциация экспертов по коморбидной неврологии
Научно-практический журнал

КОМОРБИДНАЯ НЕВРОЛОГИЯ

COMORBIDITY NEUROLOGY
|
ISSN 3034-185X (Print) ISSN 3033-7445 (Online)
Журнал является рецензируемым научно-практическим изданием
Журнал основан в 2023 году. Периодичность: 4 раза в год
Регистрационный номер: ПИ № ФС 77-86353 от 27.11.2023
Назад
Обзорная статья
Октябрь 2026 №3 Том 3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62505/3034-185x-2026-3-3-87-94
Скачать статью в PDF
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: Specific Mechanism or Reproducibility Crisis? A Review

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BFB) is a widely used non-pharmacological technique based on slow, resonance-frequency breathing (~6 breaths/min), presumed to act through a specific autonomic mechanism involving baroreflex resonance and vagal afferent signaling.

AIM. To critically evaluate whether the proposed specific autonomic mechanism of HRV-BFB is supported by sham-controlled trial evidence, or whether its clinical effects are better explained by non-specific psychological factors. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (1996–2026), focusing on randomized controlled trials with a valid sham condition, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and neuroimaging studies of HRV-BFB.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The classical baroreflex-resonance model is supported by several physiological studies (increased baroreflex gain, specificity of the individual resonance frequency). However, the small set of trials employing a valid sham condition presents a mixed picture: in one of the most methodologically rigorous trials to date (N = 47), HRV-BFB outperformed sham on affect and depression outcomes but produced no specific modulation of autonomic nervous system activity. Other sham-controlled trials (in critical illness polyneuropathy and traumatic brain injury) yield conflicting results. A comparison of individually determined resonance frequency against a fixed 0.1 Hz rate found no significant difference in clinical efficacy. 

CONCLUSION. The clinical effects of HRV-BFB are probably genuine, but current sham-controlled evidence does not unambiguously confirm the specific autonomic mechanism proposed by the classical baroreflex-resonance model. Non-specific mechanisms – prefrontal self-regulation and expectation effects – may contribute substantially. Future trials should assess psychological and autonomic outcomes simultaneously within a valid sham-controlled design.

KEYWORDS: heart rate variability, biofeedback, baroreflex, vagus nerve, reproducibility of results, placebo effect 

For citation: Es'haghi M., Safarov M.Sh. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: Specific Mechanism or Reproducibility Crisis? A Review. Comorbidity Neurology. 2026; 3 (3): 87–94. https://doi.org/10.62505/3034-185x-2026-3-3-87-94 

*For correspondence: Mahdis Es'haghi, Faculty of Medicine, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia, e-mail: mahdis.eshaghi@mail.ru.

REFERENCES

1. American Heart Association Task Force & European Society of Cardiology Task Force. (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 93 (5): 1043–1065. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043

2. Berntson G.G., Bigger J.T., Eckberg D.L., Grossman P., et al. Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997; 34 (6): 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x

3. Shaffer F., Ginsberg J.P. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in Public Health. 2017; 5: 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258

4. Lehrer P.M., Gevirtz R. Heart rate variability biofeedback: How and why does it work? Frontiers in Psychology. 2014; 5: 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756

5. Vaschillo E., Vaschillo B., Lehrer P. Characteristics of resonance in heart rate variability stimulated by biofeedback. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2006; 31 (2): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9009-3

6. Vaschillo E., Lehrer P., Rishe N., Konstantinov M. Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: A preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2002; 27 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014587304314

7. Lehrer P.M., Vaschillo E., Vaschillo B. Resonant frequency biofeedback training to increase cardiac variability: Rationale and manual for training. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2000; 25 (3): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009554825745

8. Lehrer P.M., Vaschillo E., Vaschillo B., Lu S.-E., et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback increases baroreflex gain and peak expiratory flow. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003; 65 (5): 796–805. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000089200.81962.19

9. Steffen P.R., Austin T., DeBarros A., Brown T. The impact of resonance frequency breathing on measures of heart rate variability, blood pressure, and mood. Frontiers in Public Health. 2017; 5: 222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00222

10. Laborde S., Allen M.S., Borges U., Iskra M., et al. Psychophysiological effects of slow-paced breathing at six cycles per minute with or without heart rate variability biofeedback. Psychophysiology. 2022; 59 (9): e13952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13952

11. Lehrer P., Kaur K., Sharma A., Shah K., Huseby R., et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback improves emotional and physical health and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2020; 45 (3): 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z

12. Goessl V.C., Curtiss J.E., Hofmann S.G. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2017; 47 (15): 2578–2586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001003

13. Pizzoli S.F.M., Marzorati C., Gatti D., Monzani D., et al. A meta-analysis on heart rate variability biofeedback and depressive symptoms. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 6650. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86149-7

14. Karavidas M.K., Lehrer P.M., Vaschillo E., Vaschillo B., et al. Preliminary results of an open label study of heart rate variability biofeedback for the treatment of major depression. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2007; 32 (1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9029-z

15. Siepmann M., Aykac V., Unterdörfer J., Petrowsk, K., Mueck-Weymann M. A pilot study on the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with depression and in healthy subjects. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2008; 33 (4): 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9064-z

16. Beckham A.J., Greene T.B., Meltzer-Brody S. A pilot study of heart rate variability biofeedback therapy in the treatment of perinatal depression on a specialized perinatal psychiatry inpatient unit. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2013; 16 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-012-0318-7

17. Lin I.-M., Fan S.-Y., Yen C.-F., Yeh Y.-C., et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback increased autonomic activation and improved symptoms of depression and insomnia among patients with major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience. 2019; 17 (2): 222–232. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2019.17.2.222

18. Nashiro K., Yoo H.J., Min J., Cho C., Nasseri P., et al.. Effects of a randomised trial of 5-week heart rate variability biofeedback intervention on mind wandering and associated brain function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2022; 22: 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-022-01019-7

19. Schumann A., de la Cruz F., Köhler S., Brotte L., Bär K.-J. The influence of heart rate variability biofeedback on cardiac regulation and functional brain connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021; 15, 691988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.691988
20. Vann-Adibe S., Tsui H.K.H., Zhou H.Q., Ciren Z., Li C., Cha S.K.W. Efficacy and methodology of remote heart rate variability biofeedback interventions for mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09750-w

21. Breach N.B. Heart rate variability biofeedback in the treatment of major depression (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey). 2012. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3J96549

22. Minjoz S., Jeanne R., Pellissier S., Hot P. Psychophysiological effects of heart rate variability biofeedback versus sham biofeedback: A randomized controlled trial. Biological Psychology, advance online publication. 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301051126000670

23. Talbert L., Allen W., Wheeler A., Kaelberer Z., Baldwin S. A., et al. A randomized sham-controlled trial of heart rate variability biofeedback following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2026; 51: 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w

24. Sedghi A., Bartels C., Simon E., Krause F., Arndt M., et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback for critical illness polyneuropathy: A randomized sham-controlled study. European Journal of Neurology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16512

25. Spalding D.M., Ejoor T., Zhao X., Bomarsi D., Ciliberti M., et al. Effects of a brief resonance frequency breathing exercise on heart rate variability and inhibitory control in the context of generalised anxiety disorder. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 2025; 50 (2): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09687-0

26. Sumińska S., Rynkiewicz A., Szulczewski M. Resonance frequency versus fixed 0.1 Hz breathing in HRV biofeedback: A four-week randomized comparison. Scientific Reports. 2026. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-53333-6

27. Meehan Z.M., Shaffer F. Do longer exhalations increase HRV during slow-paced breathing? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. Advance online publication. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-024-09637-2

28. Blaser B.L., Weymar M., Wendt J. The effect of a single-session heart rate variability biofeedback on attentional control: Does stress matter? Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1292983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1292983

29. Thayer J.F., Lane R.D. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2000; 61 (3): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4

30. Thayer J.F., Åhs F., Fredrikson M., Sollers J.J., Wager T.D. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2012; 36 (2): 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Mahdis Es'haghi, Faculty of Medicine, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia. E-mail: mahdis.eshaghi@mail.ru. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009- 0003-6853-9344.

Mirali Sh. Safarov, Phthisiologist, Regional Tuberculosis Hospital, Kaluga, Russia. E-mail: miraliduhtur@mail.ru.

Author contributions. All authors confirm their authorship according to the international ICMJE criteria (all authors contributed significantly to the conception, study design and preparation of the article, read and approved the final version before publication).

Funding. This study was not supported by any external sources of funding.

Disclosure. The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

 

The content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
©2026, Mahdis Es'haghi, Mirali Sh. Safarov

Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с политикой использования файлов cookie. Подробнее
Принять Отклонить